Presenter's Name _____________________________ Evaluator's Name__________________________

Presentation Title _______________________________________________________________

Grading Scale:  Strongly Disagree (1) Disagree (2) Neutral (3) Agree (4) Strongly Agree (5)

Presentation Quality:

• The presentation was well-organized. _____ ( Did the presentation seem to have a logical progression? )
• The presentation appeared to be well-rehearsed. _____ ( Did the presenter seem to know what to say next? )
• The presentation was timed well with sufficient time for discussion. _____ ( Did the presenter seem to know how to answer the questions? )

Technical Content:

• I understand exactly what the reported work is. _____ (Do I know what the work is after hearing the presentation?)
• The work seem to be completed ______ (Did the presented show evidence that the design works?)
• Proper tests were performed ______ (Did presenter show simulation results that indicate correct working of the design?)
  

Visual Aids:

• The visual aids were very helpful in understanding the work. _____ ( Would my understanding be less complete without them? )
• The visual aids were very well done. _____ ( Do the visual aids show careful preparation? )

Total Points: _______

Comments on the presentation: (This is the basis for your 'Participation')

The best thing about this work is: ____________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________

The most disappointing aspect of this work is: ____________________________________________

 _______________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________